نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری جامعهشناسی سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 استاد گروه مطالعات زنان دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه علامه
3 دانشیار جامعهشناسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
It has been criticized that Foucault did not explain resistance and that his subject is imprisoned within itself and subjugated by language. The present research understands Foucault's subject, in most of his works, not as a subject but as a subjugated-subject; however, it claims that he also spoke of a subject that has existential aspects—this subject is no longer subjugated, and without this subject, Foucault's intellectual framework remains incomplete. The idea of resistance is always present throughout the expanse of his works, and this concept has an ontological correspondence with the concept of the subject. In reality, Foucault speaks of two subjects: first, a subjugated subject that emerges within discourse and the practices of power and self-techniques. This subject bears a clear resemblance to the subjects of Lacan and Althusser. Second, a subject capable of re-creation and self-creation, which can disrupt the knowledge-power game and create, not discover, a new identity. This subject is close to Nietzsche's envisioned Übermensch. The present study will first provide a brief overview of Foucault's archaeological-genealogical thought and its emancipatory aspects, then address the issue of the subject. The main emphasis is on Foucault's second subject, which, despite its considerable importance, has received less attention due to the dense discourses surrounding the first subject.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)