Merleau-Ponty and Dialectical Turn of Phenomenology

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Abstract
Merleau-Pont’s location in the phenomenological movement, established by Edmund Husserl, can be determined only by considering the important role of “dialectic” in his thought. Using the dialectical method, he opens up a new path toward a “dialectical phenomenology” to release it from the antinomies into which it was entrapped. By adopting a dialectical strategy, Merleau-Ponty no longer defines the scope of phenomenology as “pure consciousness.” Encroachment of the “consciousness” and the “world” on each other does not allow defining the scope of phenomenological investigation in terms of “substantiality of a domain.” Therefore, contrary to Husserl and Heidegger who delineated the borders of phenomenological investigation against sciences, Merleau-Ponty, choosing a Hegelian approach, tries to overcome the ontic/ontological duality
Keywords

  1. رشیدیان، عبدالکریم، هوسرل در متن آثارش، تهران: نشر نی، 1384.
  2. کارمن، تیلور، مرلوپونتی، ترجمۀ مسعود علیا، تهران: ققنوس، 1390.
  3. ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ، رساله منطقی-فلسفی، ترجمۀ میرشمس الدین سلطانی، تهران: امیرکبیر، 1386.
  4. Dupond, Pascal. Le vocabulaire de Merleau-Ponty. Paris: Ellipses edition, 2001.
  5. Evans, Fred, and Leonard Lawlor. Chiasms-Merleau-Ponty’s Notion of Flesh. Albany: State University of New York, 2000.
  6. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Freidrich. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Translated by Klaus Brinkmann and Haviel O. Hahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2010.
  7. Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic. Translated by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2010.
  8. _______, The Difference between Fischte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy. Albany: State university of New Yourk place, 1977.
  9. Heidegger, Martin. Grund Probleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.
  10. _______, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1988.
  11. _______, Sein und Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio klostermann, 1977.
  12. Hoffman, Thomas Sören. Hegel. Berlin: marixverlag, 2004.
  13. Husserl, Edmond. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosopy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982.
  14. Kelly, Dorrance Sean. "Seeing Things in Merleau-Ponty." In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B. Hansen, 74-11. New York: Cambridge, 2005.
  15. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. L’oeil et l’esprit. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1964.
  16. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Donald A. Landes. New York: Routledge, 2012.
  17. Merleau-ponty, Maurice. "Possibilite de la philosophie." In Resumes de cours, by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, 139-157. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1952-160.
  18. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The VIsible and the Invisible. Northwestern: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
  19. Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 2011.
  20. Smith, A. D. "The flesh of perception: Merleau-Ponty and Husserl." In Reading Merleau-Ponty, by Thomas Baldwin, edited by Thomas Baldwin, 1-23. New York: Routledge, 2007.
Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 76
November 2017
Pages 147-168

  • Receive Date 15 June 2016
  • Accept Date 31 December 2020

Article View 10,783
PDF Download 2,767