God,Time, and Certain Knowledge in Descartes' Philosophy

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Philosophy Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.48308/kj.2025.237356.1296

Abstract

In Descartes' epistemological system, God is the foundation and basis for the duration of knowledge and its certainty. He is not merely a transcendent and passive being but an active entity who continuously intervenes in the structure of the world, ensuring the continuity of phenomena and, as a result, the coherence of knowledge. The dependence of certainty on God confronts Descartes' epistemology with one of its most fundamental challenges, the "Cartesian Circle." Proving the existence of God is necessary to validate clear and distinct perceptions, while these very perceptions serve as the basis for proving God's existence. This article offers a way to resolve this circularity by linking Descartes' theory of time to the notion of continuous creation. Descartes does not believe in the intrinsic continuity between different moments. The continuity of time and the survival of each moment of the world are the results of God's constant action. According to this interpretation, Descartes' epistemological system is not separate from theology, and the validity and foundation of knowledge are tied to the existence and will of God.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Arthur, Richard (1988). Continuous Creation, Continuous Time: A Refutation of the Alleged Discontinuity of Cartesian Time. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26, 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0061
Carriero, John (2008). Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes's Meditations. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833191
Descartes, René (1912). Philosophical Works of Descartes; Vol. 2: trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross. Cambridge University Press. (Abbreviated HR)
Descartes, René (1984-1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols: trans. by John G. Cottingham, Robert Stoothof, Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge University Press. (Abbreviated CSM)
Descartes, René (1991). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 3: Correspondence, trans. by John G. Cottingham, Robert Stoothof, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Abbreviated CSMK)
Della Rocca, Michael (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00504.x
Doney, W. (1955). The Cartesian Circle. Journal of the History of Ideas, 16(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707635
Frankfurt, H. G. (1962). Memory and the Cartesian Circle. The Philosophical Review, 71(4), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183463
Gewirth, Alan (1970). The cartesian circle Reconsidered. Journal of Philosophy 67 (19):668-685. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024587
Gorham, Geoffrey (2008). Cartesian Temporal Atomism: A New Defence, A New Refutation 1. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780802200760
Gorham, Geoffrey (2010). Descartes on Persistence and Temporal Parts. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014090.003.0139
Levy, Ken (2005). Is Descartes a Temporal Atomist? British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13, 627–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780500293026
Van Cleve, James. (1979). Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle. The Philosophical Review. 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184779.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 January 2025
  • Revise Date: 07 February 2025
  • Accept Date: 11 February 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics