Bases of new logic in view founders of analytic philosophy and its relation with formal ontology and formal apophantics in view of Husserl

The analytic philosophy and new logic were established on the linguistic turn. The idea practically was based in a form to expressions will refer as such, no through sense. Thus. The new logic was established through syntactic relation of mathematical functional expressions and their reference when their relation is considered with truth, as the syntactic relation represents composited relations of the reference that is expressible through quantity or quality or these both.
Husserl. In contrast, took to the sense refers to object. He never did not accept to meaning is grasped through sentence as a text and never he did not go ahead to meaning only must is grasped through language expresses it. Because he has token guarantee this thesis that the meaning is given through an intentional act. In critical view of present paper, the above thesis makes sickly pertaining to research essence of formal and new logic and they are made as executor such meanings, if we can grasp them without used the language, and expressions lose exact and presented as interpretable. by the thesis, the language placed outdoors from intentional act, then Husserl can claim to the mathematical is not tied in formal logic, thereby the mathematical is not explicable through formal logic and the early is not fundable on the latter. Then Husserl searched their relation into concern with known to present theory of manifold and pure logic that would be fundamental theories for a logic. But in critical view of present paper this doctrines are failed, because they have been illustrated on based the language as a based principle for logic, it is sufficient to we call them some doctrines on logic. But we can consider his explanation of pure logic a fundamental ontology by an interpretation that I did it on Aristotle, if pure logic is funded into the language.