Philosophy and Theurgy in Proclus' Thought

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

The Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia

10.48308/kj.2026.243897.1420

Abstract

Theurgy is a form of magic that employs symbols to subjugate the will of the gods and manipulate divine powers. Theurgists believe that certain objects, due to their symbolic resemblances, possess a connection with the divine, and through their utilization, one can capture the will and powers of these deities. According to Proclus, theurgy is a form of knowledge, and despite certain differences, philosophy and theurgy share common foundations. While philosophy is a knowledge based on names and ideas, theurgy is a knowledge based on symbols. Proclus synthesizes these two forms of knowledge by providing a distinct interpretation of the concepts of causality and resemblance. He argues that all knowledge is founded upon a causal relationship, and that causality itself is based on the resemblance between cause and effect. Every cause produces effects that resemble it, and every effect returns to its cause by virtue of this resemblance; this return of the effect to its cause constitutes knowledge. The notions of causality and resemblance described by Proclus are foundational principles of magic, lacking parallels in traditional science or philosophy. By offering this distinct explanation of causality and resemblance, Proclus brings philosophy and magic into closer alignment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Dodds, E. R. (1992), Introduction and Commentary on The Elements of Theology, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Des Places, Eduard (1977), “Jamblch und die Chaldaeischen Orakel”, Die Philosophie des Neuplatonismus, Herausgegeben von Clemens Zintzen, Wissenschaftliche Buchgeselschaft, Darmstadt, pp. 294-306.
Duvick, B (2007). Introduction and Notes on Proclus on Plato’s Cratylus. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Frazer, James George (2017), The Golden Bough, A Study in Magic and Religion, Translated by Kazem Firoozmand (in Persian).
Hirschle, Maurus (1979), Sprachphilosophie und Namenmagie im Neuplatonismus, Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan.
Marinus, The Life of Proclus, translated by L. J. Rosan, in: Rosan, Laurence, Jay (1949), The Philosophy of Proclus, The Final Phase of Ancient Thougth, Cosmos, New York.
Plato (1970), Complete Works, The Loeb Classical Library, London.
Plotinus (1930), The Enneads, Translated by Stephen MacKenna, Second Edition Revised
by B. S. Page, London.
Proclus (1987), Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, Translated by G. R. Morrow and J. M.
Dillon, Princeton University Press.
Proclus (1954), Commentary on Alcibiades, Translated by L. G. Westerink, North Holland
Publishing Company.
Proclus (2007), On Plato’s Cratylus, Translated by Brian Duvick, Cornell University Press,
Ithaca, New York
Proclus (1816), On The Theology of Plato, Translated by Thomas Taylor, United
Kingdom, Law
Proclus (2007), Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Translated with an Introduction and Notes
by Harold Tarrant, Cambridge University Press.
Proclus (1992), The Elements of Theology, with Translation, Introduction and Commentary
by E. R. Dodds, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Rosan, Laurence, Jay (1949), The Philosophy of Proclus: The Final Phase of Ancient Thought,
New York.
Sheppard, Anne, ‘Proclus’ Attitude to Theurgy’, The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol.
32, No. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 212-224.
Schissel, Otmar, ‘Platon und die Chaldaeischen in fruehbyzantinischer Zeit’, Neophilologus,
Vol. 14, 1929, pp. 49-53.