The Historical Thesis About Philosophy: Clarifying Thesis Evaluating Reasons and Investigating Implications

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

university of shahid beheshti

10.48308/kj.2025.240438.1328

Abstract

Some contemporary philosophers put forth a claim which is called “Historical Thesis about the Philosophy”. In the first part of this paper, I clarify and classify the various formulations of this thesis and I show that these formulations can be divided into two classes of process-centered and product-centered formulations. In the second part of the paper, I evaluate the arguments made by the proponents of historical thesis about philosophy. Firstly, I explicate the arguments for the product-centered formulation of historical thesis and show that product-centered formulation consists of two claims. Then I evaluate the arguments for the process-centered formulation of historical thesis. I put forth two moderate and radical versions of process-centered formulation of historical thesis and I continue to argue that moderate version is uncontroversial, but radical version is provocative. I formulate two arguments for the radical version and continue to reconstruct two counterarguments by critics of historical thesis. In the third part of the paper, I discuss the implications of historical thesis. The main question is that even if radical version of process-centered formulation is justified, what epistemic implications we can derive from radical version. In the conclusion, I summarize the findings of this research and I emphasize that it is necessary to study the historicist movement in order to investigate the historical thesis in a more comprehensive and systematic way.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Translated by Ezzatollah Fouladvand, Tehran: Kharazami Publication, third edition (In Persian).
Bernasconi, R. (1986). Face to Face with Levinas, Richard Cohen (Ed.). Albany: SUNY Press.
Bernasconi, R. (1985). The Question of Language in Heidegger’s History of Being, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Critchley, S. (1999). Introduction: What Is Continental Philosophy?. In A Companion to Continental Philosophy, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Fackenheim, E. (1961). Metaphysics and Historicity. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Gracia, J. (1992). Philosophy & Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography. State University of New York Press.
Page, C. (1995). Philosophical Historicism and the Betrayal of First Philosophy. The Pennsylvania State University.
Page, C. (1987). Radical Historicism: A Study on the Contemporary Betrayal of Philosophy. Ph.D Diss. The Pennsylvania State University.
Piercy, R. (2005). Gadamer on the Relation between Philosophy and Its History. Idealistic Studies (35)1, pp. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20053513
Piercy, R. (2009). The Uses of the Past from Heidegger to Rorty: Doing Philosophy Historically. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rescher, N. (2014). Metaphilosophy: Philosophy in Philosophical Perspective.vLanham: Lexington Books.
Slagle, J. (2019). Yes, Eliminative Materialism Is Self-Defeating. Philosophical Investigations (43)3, 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12252
Taylor, Ch. (1984). Philosophy and its History. In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Richard Rorty, J.B. Schneewind & Quentin Skinner (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bradie, Mi., & Harms, W. (2020, Spring). Evolutionary Epistemology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrived from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/
Shenakht
Volume 18, Issue 2 - Serial Number 90
September 2025
Pages 95-118

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 June 2025
  • Accept Date: 31 July 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics