Faith and its Components in Tillich Thought: a Study and Criticism

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 PhD student

2 Associate Professor in esfahan uni.

Abstract

Paul Tillich who is one the most impressive theologians and philosophers of religion of the twentieth century, propounded a new and challenging concept of faith. For him, Faith is the state of being ultimately concerned, that inherently consists of the element of doubt. This existential doubt, in our interpretation, emerges through all human existential regions including cognitive region of beliefs, emotions and wants, causing an anxiety that assaults heedlessly the whole existence of the person. The only remedy Tillich could prescribe to conquer this radical incertitude, is the courage. Notwithstanding all issues that threaten the being, values and meaning of human life, the man of faith practicing the virtue of courage could overcome these doubts. In this essay, we analyze and criticize Tillich's view and describe the notion of existential doubt. Furthermore we put forward three justifications advocating religious faith must contain doubt and uncertainty. There are: necessity of volitional affirmation, necessity of trust, and necessity of moral act admirableness in faith.

Keywords

References

  1. - Audi, Robert, 2008, “Belief, faith, and acceptance”, in: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 63, pp. 87-102
  2. - Cerf, Walter, 1953, “Certainty and Certitude”, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 13(4), pp. 515-524
  3. - Freud, Sigmund, 1961, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, translated by: James Straghey, W.W. Norton & Company, New York
  4. - Frijda, Nico; Manstead, Antony; Sacha, Bem, 2000, “The Influence of Emotions on Beliefs”, in: Emotions and Beliefs, edited by Frijda, Manstead, and Bem, Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge
  5. - Kagan, Jerome, 2007, What is Emotion?, Yale University Press, London
  6. - Klein, Peter D., 1981, Certainty: A Refutation of Scepticism, Minnesota Uni. Press, Minneapolis
  7. - Manning, Russell Re (ed.), 2009, The Cambridge Companion to Paul Tillich, Cambridge Uni. Press, New York
  8. - Mercer, Jonathan, 2010, “Emotional Belief’s”, in: International Organization, Vol. 64(1), pp. 1-31
  9. - Olson, Carl, "The Existential Doubt of Tillich and the Great Doubt of Hakuin", in: Buddhist-Christian Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 4-12
  10. - Radhakrishnan, M.A., 1912, Essentials of Psychology, London, Oxford university press
  11. - Reed, Baron, 2011 "Certainty", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/certainty/>
  12. - Ross, Robert R.N., 1975, “The Non-Existence of God: Tillich, Aquinas, and the Pseudo-Dionysius”, in: The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 141-166
  13. - Strongman, K.T., 2003, The Psychology of Emotion, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex
  14. - Swinburne, Richard,2005, Faith and Reason, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  15. - Tillich, Paul, 1953, the Shaking of the Foundations, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York
  16. - _________, 1955a, Biblical Religion and Search for Ultimate Reality, in: Paul Tillich writings in the Philosophy of Religion, 1987, De Gruter-Evangelisches Verlagswerk GmbH, Berlin
  17. - _________, 1959, Theology of Culture, Oxford Uni. Press, London (electronic ver.)
  18. - _________, 1973, What is Religion?, translated by: James Later Adams, Harper Torchbooks, New York
  19. - Unamuno, Miguel de., 2005, Tragic Sense of Life, electronic version at www.gutenberg.net
  20. - Verbin, N.K., 2002, “Uncertainty and religious belief”, in: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 51: pp. 1-37
  21. - Wainwright, William J., 1971, “Paul Tillich and Arguments for the Existence of God”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 39(2), pp. 171-185

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 05 December 2016
  • Revise Date: 03 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics