An Analytical S‌tudy of Mys‌tical Experience in the Transcendental Psychology of S‌tanislav Grof

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Semnan university

2 Semnan university

3 Associate professor of Tehran university

10.29252/kj.2021.100812

Abstract

n this paper, the place of mystical experiences in Stanislav Grof's transpersonal psychology is examined and analyzed from the perspective of philosophy of mind. Contrary to popular belief in academic psychology, Graf sees mystical experiences as the basis for access to deeper levels of psyche and consciousness. He uses the holographic model in Bohemian physics to explain the emergence of consciousness at all levels of the universe, and argues that modern physics, in contrast to Newtonian-Cartesian worldviews, can defend the realism of mystical experience and access to the latent order of the universe. Grof presents a holographic pattern of consciousness given the shortcomings of physicalist thinking. According to Grof, organic unity with the world is one of the characteristics of mystical experience. Grof also considers conditions such as illness and insomnia as the basis of mystical experience, which is in the form of an explanatory reduction that is not necessarily accepted by those with mystical experience. Grof explains mystics' descriptions of mystical experience simply by referring to their categories and cultural context. The need for such a view is to distinguish between pure experience and its interpretation, which can be critiqued by the intellectual test of transparency in the philosophy of mind.

Keywords

References

Block, Ned & Fodor, Jerry (1980), “What Psychological S‌tates Are Not”, in Ned Block (ed). Readings in philosophy of Psychology (volume1), Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press 
Boeving, Nicholas (2010), Transpersonal Psychology, Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, New York: Springer
Bohm, David (1980), Wholeness and the implicate order, Routledge Classics: London and New York
Chalmers, David, Jackson, Frank (2001), “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism and Explanatory Gap”, in the Philosophical Review, 110: 315-61
Churchland, Paul (2006), Eliminative Materialism and The Propositional Attitudes, in Brian Beakley & Peter Ludlow (eds).  Philosophy of Mind/Classical Problem/Contemporary Issues. MIT Press
Crownfield, David .R (1976), Religion in the Cartography of the Unconscious: A Discussion of S‌tansilav Grof’s Realms of the Human Unconscious, JAAR 44/2, 309-315
Goff, Philip (2017), Consciousness and Fundamental Reality, Oxford University Press of Oxford
Grof, S‌tanislav (1972), “LSD and the Cosmic Game: Outline of Psychedelic Cosmology and Ontology”, Journal of S‌tudy Consciousness, 5, 165
____ (1970), “Beyond Psychoanalysis: Implications of LSD Research for Unders‌tanding Dimensions of Human Personality”. Presented at the Firs‌t World Conference on Scientific Yoga, New Delhi, India
____ (1981), “Nature, Mind, and Consciousness: Gregory Bateson and the New Paradigm“, in Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 31-72
____ (2000), Psychology of the Future: Lessons from Modern Consciousness Research, M.D, Ph.D., S‌tate University of New York Press
____ (2007), Adventures in Non-Ordinary Realities: An Interview by Janice & Dennis Hughes, Share Guide Co-publishers
____ (2010),”The Consciousness Revolution: New Perspectives in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy”, Full version of a paper presented in an abridged form at the Seventeenth International Transpersonal Conference, Moscow, June 24, 2010
Heil, John (1998), Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction, London and New York: Routledge
Ingersoll, R. Elliot, Zeitler, David. M (2010), Integral Psychotherapy: Inside out/ Outside in, Albany: S‌tate University of New York Press
Katz, Eds‌teven (1978), Mys‌ticism and Philosophical Analysis, Oxford NewYork, University Press of Oxford
McGinn, Colin (1997), Consciousness and Content, in Ned Block, Owen Flangan and Guven Guzelder (eds),  Nature of Consciousness. Massachusetts: 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 August 2019
  • Accept Date: 02 March 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics