Heidegger’s Ontological Interpretation of the System as the Jointure of the Order of Being (Emphasizing the Principle of Identity in Schelling’s Freedom System)

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

University of Isfahan

10.29252/kj.2022.213770.0

Abstract

:The possibility of the system and its will as a way of rediscovering human the being is characteristic of the modern age. In Schelling’s Treaties on the Essence of Human Freedom (1936), Heidegger, by asking what the system is and comparing it to German idealism, considers the conditions necessary for the formation of the system in order to understand the intellectual foundation of the modern age. Through the concept of the system, the jointure of which is determined on the basis of mathematical order and subjective foundations, Heidegger uses the concept of the system as the jointure of the order of being. Research on the formation of the system and the question of the possibility of a system of freedom is also the main issue of Schelling in his treatise on The Philosophical Studies of the Essence of Human Freedom (1809). The purpose of this research is to analyze Heidegger’s interpretation of the concept of system by emphasizing the principle of identity in Schelling’s system of freedom. The present article considers two questions: How does Schelling’s attempt to eliminate the existing misinterpretations of this principle in the various interpretations of the pantheism provide the possibility of the compatibility of the freedom system? In Heidegger’s interpretation, how does Schelling’s reading of the necessity of paying attention to “is” lead to an ontological question of the meaning and truth of being in German idealism, how does the question of the system changes in the way the structure of beings is connected in general?

Keywords

References

Alderwick, Charlotte (2015). “A Temporal Essence and Existential Freedom in Schelling”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 115–137. 
Allison, H.E (1996), Teleology and Scientific method in Kant’s Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant critical Assessment. Vol. 4.
Bruno, G. Anthony (2017). “Schelling on the Possibility of Evil: Rendering Pantheism, Freedom and Time Consistent”, Published online: September 2, 2017.
Buchdahl, G (1996), The Relation Between Understanding and Reason in the Architectonic of Kant’s Philosophy, Immanuel Kant, critical Assessment. Vol. 4.
Dallmayr, R. Fred (1984). “Ontology of Freedom: Heidegger and Political”, Political Theory, Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1984), pp. 204-234. 
Emad, Parvis (1975), Heidegger on Schelling’s concept of freedom, Man and World, 8 (2): 157-174.
Griffiths, Dominic (2017). “Martin Heidegger’s principle of identity: On belonging and Ereignis”, South African Journal of Philosophy, 36:3, 326-336.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986), Werke, Band 5, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, Martin (1941). Von Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit (1809), Gesamtausgabe. II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919- 1944, Bd. 42, Von I, schüBler, Frankfurt am Main 1988.
Heidegger, Martin (1969), Identity and Difference, Trans. Joan Stambaugh, New York: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin (1985), Schelling’s treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom, Trans. J. Stambaugh, Ohio University Press.
Kraft. M (1996), Kant’s Theory of teleology, Immanuel Kant critical Assessment. Vol. 4.
Ruin, Hans (2008), “The destiny of Freedom, in Heidegger”, In: Contiental Philosophy Review. 41/ 2008. 277- 299.
Sikka, Sonya (1994), “Heidegger’s Appropriation of Schelling”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy. Vol. XXXII. PP. 421-448. 
Shinakht (A Persian Word Means Knowledge)
Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 85
February 2022
Pages 151-172

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 May 2020
  • Revise Date: 13 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 05 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics