نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری
نویسنده
دانشیار فلسفه و کلام دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Many scholars have regarded the terminology of state in Suhrawardi's illuminative works to be equal to accident in peripatetic terminology, and they believe that Suhrawardi has only gone so far to proposed a new terminology. In this present paper, by making a comparison between state in philosophy of illumination and accident in peripatetic philosophy, as well as by referring to Suhrawardi's explanations in this regard, it will be shown that these two terminologies are different from each other. State has been used in Suhrawardi's works with the connotations of appearance, shape, condition, and non-substance; state, in its connotation of non-substance, is opposed to substance in the interpretation of the proponents of illuminative philosophy, not in the viewpoint of peripatetic philosophers. Therefore, Suhrawardi has been obliged to coin a new terminology in order to refer to the connotation of non-substance in the interpretation of the philosophy of illumination, and he has used the term accident with the connotation of non-substance only from the viewpoint of peripatetic philosophers. As a result of the difference between the definitions of substance in peripatetic philosophy and philosophy of illumination, accident and state, which are respectively used opposite the concepts of peripatetic substance and illuminative substance, are also different from each other
کلیدواژهها [English]