نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری
نویسنده
کارشناس ارشد فلسفه، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Some parts of Philosophical Investigations are prey to relativistic interpretations. Some of the most important of them are Language games and Kripke’s reading of the concept of rule following. In addition, contemporary philosophers discuss the possibility of dialogue and comparison between forms of life and their independency .Some of these philosophers concentrate on differences of forms of life and deny the possibility of comparison and understanding each other stressing on special paragraphs of philosophical Investigations. On the other hand, another group emphasizes on other parts of philosophical Investigations and invokes Wittgenstein’s approach to various forms of life. They don’t accept relativistic readings of philosophical Investigations. They argue that when forms of life are completely different and independent, people living in a form of life cannot recognize any other forms of life and they cannot even speak about them or even name them as “form of life”. Similarly, Interpreters have adverse views concerning kripkie’s reading of Wittgenstein. On the one side, a group believes in an objective criterion for determination of sense. On the other, a group thinks that following a rule according to what language users do, is the only criterion we have.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)