نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی بندرعباس
2 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد واحد بندر عباس
3 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد کرمان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Kant and Mulla Sadra, as two great philosophers, are comparable in some positions, such as those of the subject, with the difference in their semantics. Self in Kant's thinking is severely limited in his ability to recognize the process and is influenced by multiple breath filters. Kant, while distinguishing the world of Noumont and Phenomenon, recognizes the soul solely in the form of empirical perceptions of the phenomenon of creatures. Because of the belief in obstruction through the knowledge of knowledge, he prescribes a form of limitation of skepticism and fully delineates the domain of ethics and metaphysics. Mulla Sadra takes into account his soul not as passive but active in the process of perception by virtue of his belief in physical fitness. This basis entails the passage from dogmatism to limitation of skepticism. But Mulla Sadra, unlike Kant, not only does not limit self-knowledge; it considers it to be widespread. In the combination of two areas of ethics and metaphysics, Sadr al-Motaalahin considers the process of unity of wisdom and rationality to take possession of the soul to the knowledge of the soul of Al-Amri and conform to reality by requiring self-realization in the practical aspect and the attraction to the ethics and austerities of the eternity and existentialism in the theoretical field.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)